Monday, February 23, 2015

20th BSE Case Raises New Concerns about Canada's Feeding Practices and Voluntary Testing Program; Highlights Importance of COOL

2015

 

R-CALF United Stockgrowers of America

 

"Fighting for the U.S.Cattle Producer"

 

For Immediate Release

 

February 23, 2015

 

20th BSE Case Raises New Concerns about Canada's Feeding Practices and Voluntary Testing Program; Highlights Importance of COOL

 

Billings, Mont. - On February 13, 2015, Canada confirmed its 20th case of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or mad cow disease) in a native-born animal. Although Canada obtained confirmation of this latest case on February 11, it withheld information regarding the age of the cow until February 18, 2015.

 

As shown by R-CALF USA's BSE lifespan chart, at 71 months of age this beef cow is the sixth youngest BSE-infected cow to be detected in Canada. Also, the cow was born and raised in the province of Alberta, which R-CALF USA refers to as a "BSE hotspot" because, as R-CALF USA's BSE matrix shows, 75 percent of Canada's 20 BSE-positive, native-born cattle originated there. Canada's confirmation also establishes that the cow was infected with classical BSE, which is the strain many scientists believe is spread via the consumption of contaminated feed. In contrast, the atypical strain of BSE typically affects much older animals and is believed by some scientists to occur randomly or sporadically in nature.

 

All three of the BSE cases detected in native-born United States cattle were of the atypical strain not known to be caused by the now unlawful practice of feeding ruminant tissues to ruminants. The only case of classical BSE detected in the United States was a cow imported from Alberta, Canada, and subsequently detected with the disease in the states of Washington in 2003.

 

Based on scientific evidence linking the length of the disease's incubation period to the amount of infectivity ingested, the cow's relatively young age indicates she had consumed a relatively high level of infectivity, at least as high as that which caused the infection of Canada's comparably-aged BSE cases detected in 2003, 2006, 2007 and 2008.

 

Canada resisted making any improvements to its 1997 ruminant-to-ruminant feed ban until after it had detected multiple BSE-positive cattle born well after the implementation of its feed ban, indicating its original feed ban was ineffective at arresting the spread of BSE in Canada. Canada's enhanced feed ban was then implemented July 2007 and Canada's newest BSE case is the country's first recorded BSE case born after the implantation of its upgraded feed ban.

 

"Given this new evidence that the BSE agent is still circulating in Canada's animal feed system, it is more likely than not that Canada's inferior testing program has failed to detect many other BSE-infected cattle, including asymptomatic cattle entering Canada's food system," said R-CALF USA CEO Bill Bullard.

 

Unlike other nations that instituted mandatory testing requirements for cattle entering the food chain after detecting multiple cases of classical BSE, Canada relies only on a voluntary testing program. The mandatory testing programs in the European Union and Japan successfully removed BSE-infected cattle that were entering the food system even though the infected cattle did not show any signs of the disease. This is because testing can identify BSE-positive cattle several months prior to the animal exhibiting any signs of neurological disorder.

 

Under the United States recently implemented country of origin labeling (COOL) law, beef that is derived from Canadian cattle can be distinguished in U.S. retail grocery stores because all muscle cuts of beef and ground beef are now required to be labeled as to their origin.

 

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit recently concluded that Congress' objective in implementing COOL included "empowering consumers to take possible country-specific differences in safety practices into account." The court also acknowledged that COOL can provide economy-wide benefits by "confining the market impact of a disease outbreak."

 

"The court found that U.S. consumers can use COOL to avoid purchasing meat from countries like Canada that refuse to implement a responsible testing program to keep diseased animals out of their food system," Bullard said.

 

"It is troubling that instead of acting responsibly by adopting the tried-and-proven eradication measures successfully used in the European Union and Japan, the Canadian Minister of Agriculture and other Canadian officials are bulling our U.S. Congress and U.S. citizens into repealing COOL, which is the consumers' last line of defense when foreign governments try to cut food safety corners.

 

"Canadian officials are essentially saying that if the U.S. does not agree to hide the origins of their meat in the U.S. market then they will retaliate against us, which is precisely what they are attempting to accomplish with their COOL complaint filed at the World Trade Organization.

 

"Congress and the public should ignore Canada's pompous posturing against COOL and instead work to demand that Canada be more responsible in its disease eradication efforts, particularly by implementing a mandatory testing program and strengthening its feed ban," concluded Bullard.

 

# # #

 

R-CALF USA (Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund, United Stockgrowers of America) is the largest producer-only cattle trade association in the United States. It is a national, nonprofit organization dedicated to ensuring the continued profitability and viability of the U.S. cattle industry. For more information, visit www.r-calfusa.com or, call 406-252-2516.

 

============================

 

2005

 

2/5/2005 2:34:00 PM

 

R-Calf Cattle Update: USDA Misleads Senate Agriculture Committee

 

(Billings, Mont.) - R-CALF USA reacted with disappointment to most of Thursday's testimony provided by Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns to the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee during a hearing on "Examining the effects of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) on U.S. imports and exports of cattle and beef."

 

"The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) continues to adhere to science that simply does not exist," pointed out Bill Bullard, R-CALF USA CEO. "Secretary Johanns' testimony is inconsistent with what's on record regarding BSE."

 

Bullard said that while USDA claims to be taking a world leadership position by formulating a protection plan that it says incorporates the most recently discovered science on BSE, USDA actually has rejected internationally known and established science-based standards in favor of optimistic assumptions based instead on wishful thinking.

 

USDA's Final Rule, in the following ways, compromises science acknowledged throughout the rest of the world:

 

1) It adopts the Specified Risk Materials (SRM) removal practices recommended by the World Organization for Animal Health (OlE) and practiced in the United Kingdom (UK) and the European Union (EU) for years - except that USDA only includes some high-risk tissues in its SRM removal plan (fewer tissues than included in the standard risk-reduction practices in the UK and the EU). USDA's Final Rule does not begin removal of SRMs at the age where OlE, the UK, and the EU consider it necessary. USDA's Final Rule requires SRM removal only from cattle over 30 months of age, while European countries require removal of SRMs in all cattle over 12 months of age. OlE recommends SRM removal from cattle over 6 months of age for countries with the same disease characteristics as Canada.

 

2) It adopts a BSE testing/surveillance program as recommended by OlE and as practiced by the UK and the EU for years, except that USDA's Final Rule fails to target cattle that enter the human food chain, as recommended by OlE and as practiced by the UK and the EU.

 

3) It adopts part of a meat-and-bone meal (MBM) feed ban, as has been recommended by OlE and as practiced by the UK and the EU for years, except that USDA fails to require Canada to have had its feed ban in place for the length of time recommended by OlE. USDA's Final Rule also fails to include the same products as the feed bans practiced by the UK and the EU, both of which ban blood and poultry litter from cattle feed.

 

"The BSE standards being incorporated by USDA are inferior to international standards established by OlE, and far below the science-based practices of countries that have successfully reduced the incidence of BSE," Bullard said. "Canada does not meet the definition of a minimal-risk country, based on international guidelines, and this is why 33 countries still ban Canadian beef. It's not clear why USDA should force U.S. consumers to be exposed to risks that other countries protect their citizens from."

 

Durng Thursday's hearing, Johanns asserted that continuing the ban on Canadian cattle would hasten the shift of meat-processing facilities from the U.S. to Canada, which could result in long-term damage to U.S. producers.

 

"The shift in processing is occurring because USDA already is providing an export market for Canadian boneless beef, even though Canada does not meet the basic standards required in all BSE; minimal-risk countries," Bullard explained. "In effect, USDA's Final Rule makes the U.S. a

 

1 of 2

 

dumping ground for Canadian beef products that 33 other countries - including major U.S. export customers - still won't accept.

 

"The market USDA is creating for exporting substandard Canadian beef products to the U.S. - without paying the costs that other countries incur to adequately protect against BSE - makes Canada more economically attractive to U.S. meat processors," he said.

 

"USDA continues to jeopardize the long-term well being of the U.S. cattle industry by allowing undifferentiated beef from Canada to be imported into the U.S., and under OIE guidelines, Canada is a moderate-risk BSE country," Bullard said. "The bottom line is that the only significant export market for Canadian beef today - and in the foreseeable future - is the United States. USDA's Final Rule would make the United States the only major importing nation to accept beef from a country that does not meet the standards required in the rest of the world.

 

"So, it's USDA own policy alone that promotes a shift of the processing industry to Canada," Bullard said. "And it's a real irony that USDA is now arguing that halting the expansion of the market for substandard Canadian products in the U.S. will damage the U.S. industry.

 

"The truth is that USDA is playing with fire," emphasized Bullard. "If USDA has underestimated the severity of the BSE problem in Canada - as current events suggest - the long-term negative impact of allowing any Canadian beef into the U.S. will cause far greater damage to the U.S. industry than the projected harm caused by a shift in processing."

 

R-CALF

 

================================

 

2005

 

Congress of the United States Washington, DC 20515

 

January 5, 2005

 

The Honorable Michael Johanns Governor

 

State of Nebraska

 

Office of the Governor

 

P.O. Box 94848 Lincoln, NE 68509-4848

 

Dear Governor Johanns:

 

On January 4, 2005, the U.S. Department of Agriculture announced that it would lift the ban on cattle imports from Canada, effective on March 7. A principal rationale for USDA's decision is that Canada has a "rigorous" and "effective" feed ban in place, which prevents the spread of "mad cow disease" by preventing protein derived from cattle from being fed to cattle.

 

It appears, however, that USDA has failed to review significant evidence that calls into question the effectiveness of the Canadian feed ban. If, as expected, you are confirmed as Secretary of Agriculture, we urge you to assess this new information carefully before proceeding with the plan to reopen the U.S. border to the importation of millions of Canadian cattle.

 

We have learned that:

 

" U.S. regulators have discovered animal muscle, hair, blood and bone in Canadian feed. Over the last 15 months, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued "import alerts" blocking the importation of products from 17 Canadian companies, including two of the largest feed manufacturers in the country. FDA found muscle tissue in 15 products, animal hair in five, blood in eight, and bone in two. Eight "import alerts'' on Canadian feed are still active today. "

 

Recent tests have shown that Canadian feed often contains unanticipated animal protein. Over two-thirds of samples of vegetarian animal feed manufactured in Canada and recently tested by the Canadian regulators contained "undeclared animal materials." In an internal memo, a senior regulator called the test results "worrisome."

 

Major noncompliance with Canadian feed rules persists. Recent inspections have revealed that seven Canadian feed mills had "major non-compliance" issues, and three were failing "to prevent contamination of... feeds." In one recent case, potentially contaminated feed was consumed by cattle.

 

Canada recognizes gaps in its own feed ban. On December 10, 2004, Canadian regulators concluded that "the current framework provides opportunities for prohibited proteins to be accidentally included in or cross-contaminate feeds." Canada then proposed changes to its feed ban.

 

The Honorable Michael Johanns January 5, 2005 Page 2

 

These findings, which are discussed in detail in the attachments to this letter, have significant implications. The recent discovery of another case of mad cow disease in Canada underscores the potential risk of inadequate measures to prevent the spread of the disease. If Canada's feed ban is not effective, then Canada does not qualify as a "minimal risk" country under the new definition put forward by USDA, and the importation of Canadian cattle cannot resume. It is imperative that these issues be thoroughly investigated before authorizing Canadian imports.

 

For these reasons, we urge you to consult with FDA about the "import alerts" against Canadian feed suppliers and assess their implications for the effectiveness of the Canadian feed ban. We also urge you to review the Canadian documents questioning industry's compliance with the feed ban and to talk to Canadian officials about the limitations of their current feed ban.

 

After undertaking this investigation, we urge you to appear before Congress to communicate your findings.

 

Sincerely,

 

Henry A. Waxman Ranking Minority Member Committee on Government Reform U.S. House of Representatives Kent Conrad Senator U.S. Senate

 

PLEASE SEE FULL TEXT 9 PAGES...TSS

 


 

"If the science doesn't fit what the White House wants it to be, it distorts the science."

 


 

2015

 

Friday, February 20, 2015

 

A BSE CANADIAN COW MAD COW UPDATE Transcript - Briefing (February 18, 2015)

 


 

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

 

OIE Bovine spongiform encephalopathy ,Canada

 


 

Saturday, February 14, 2015

 

Canadian Food Inspection Agency Confirms Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in Alberta

 


 

Tuesday, February 10, 2015

 

*** Alberta Canada First case of chronic wasting disease found in farm elk since 2002

 


 

Discussion:

 

The C, L and H type BSE cases in Canada exhibit molecular characteristics similar to those described for classical and atypical BSE cases from Europe and Japan.

 

*** This supports the theory that the importation of BSE contaminated feedstuff is the source of C-type BSE in Canada.

 

*** It also suggests a similar cause or source for atypical BSE in these countries. ***

 

see page 176 of 201 pages...tss

 


 

*** PLOS Singeltary reply ; Molecular, Biochemical and Genetic Characteristics of BSE in Canada Singeltary reply ;

 


 

PLOS Singeltary Comment ;

 

*** ruminant feed ban for cervids in the United States ? ***

 

31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT

 


 

Saturday, January 24, 2015

 

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy: Atypical Pros and Cons

 


 

Saturday, January 31, 2015

 

RAPID ADVICE 17-2014 : Evaluation of the risk for public health of casings in countries with a “negligible risk status for BSE” and on the risk of modification of the list of specified risk materials (SRM) with regard to BSE

 


 

10,000,000+ LBS. of PROHIBITED BANNED MAD COW FEED I.E. BLOOD LACED MBM IN COMMERCE USA 2007

 

Date: March 21, 2007 at 2:27 pm PST

 

RECALLS AND FIELD CORRECTIONS: VETERINARY MEDICINES -- CLASS II

 

PRODUCT

 

Bulk cattle feed made with recalled Darling's 85% Blood Meal, Flash Dried, Recall # V-024-2007

 

CODE

 

Cattle feed delivered between 01/12/2007 and 01/26/2007

 

RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER

 

Pfeiffer, Arno, Inc, Greenbush, WI. by conversation on February 5, 2007.

 

Firm initiated recall is ongoing.

 

REASON

 

Blood meal used to make cattle feed was recalled because it was cross- contaminated with prohibited bovine meat and bone meal that had been manufactured on common equipment and labeling did not bear cautionary BSE statement.

 

VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE

 

42,090 lbs.

 

DISTRIBUTION

 

WI

 

___________________________________

 

PRODUCT

 

Custom dairy premix products: MNM ALL PURPOSE Pellet, HILLSIDE/CDL Prot- Buffer Meal, LEE, M.-CLOSE UP PX Pellet, HIGH DESERT/ GHC LACT Meal, TATARKA, M CUST PROT Meal, SUNRIDGE/CDL PROTEIN Blend, LOURENZO, K PVM DAIRY Meal, DOUBLE B DAIRY/GHC LAC Mineral, WEST PIONT/GHC CLOSEUP Mineral, WEST POINT/GHC LACT Meal, JENKS, J/COMPASS PROTEIN Meal, COPPINI - 8# SPECIAL DAIRY Mix, GULICK, L-LACT Meal (Bulk), TRIPLE J - PROTEIN/LACTATION, ROCK CREEK/GHC MILK Mineral, BETTENCOURT/GHC S.SIDE MK-MN, BETTENCOURT #1/GHC MILK MINR, V&C DAIRY/GHC LACT Meal, VEENSTRA, F/GHC LACT Meal, SMUTNY, A- BYPASS ML W/SMARTA, Recall # V-025-2007

 

CODE

 

The firm does not utilize a code - only shipping documentation with commodity and weights identified.

 

RECALLING FIRM/MANUFACTURER

 

Rangen, Inc, Buhl, ID, by letters on February 13 and 14, 2007. Firm initiated recall is complete.

 

REASON

 

Products manufactured from bulk feed containing blood meal that was cross contaminated with prohibited meat and bone meal and the labeling did not bear cautionary BSE statement.

 

VOLUME OF PRODUCT IN COMMERCE

 

9,997,976 lbs.

 

DISTRIBUTION

 

ID and NV

 

END OF ENFORCEMENT REPORT FOR MARCH 21, 2007

 


 

2013

 

Sunday, December 15, 2013

 

FDA PART 589 -- SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED FROM USE IN ANIMAL FOOD OR FEED VIOLATIONS OFFICIAL ACTION INDICATED OIA UPDATE DECEMBER 2013 UPDATE

 


 

Tuesday, December 23, 2014

 

FDA PART 589 -- SUBSTANCES PROHIBITED FROM USE IN ANIMAL FOOD OR FEED VIOLATIONS OFFICIAL ACTION INDICATED OAI UPDATE DECEMBER 2014 BSE TSE PRION

 


 

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

 

Could we spot the next BSE?, asks BVA President

 


 


 

Thursday, July 24, 2014

 

*** Protocol for further laboratory investigations into the distribution of infectivity of Atypical BSE SCIENTIFIC REPORT OF EFSA

 


 

Saturday, June 12, 2010

 

PUBLICATION REQUEST AND FOIA REQUEST Project Number: 3625-32000-086-05 Study of Atypical Bse

 


 

Sunday, December 28, 2014

 

Reverse Freedom of Information Act request rFOIA FSIS USDA APHIS TSE PRION aka BSE MAD COW TYPE DISEASE December 2014

 


 

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

 

MAD COW USDA TSE PRION COVER UP or JUST IGNORANCE, for the record AUGUST 2014

 


 

Thursday, October 02, 2014

 

[Docket No. APHIS-2013-0064] Concurrence With OIE Risk Designations for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy

 


 

Saturday, August 14, 2010

 

BSE Case Associated with Prion Protein Gene Mutation (g-h-BSEalabama) and VPSPr PRIONPATHY

 


 

2009 UPDATE ON ALABAMA AND TEXAS MAD COWS 2005 and 2006

 


 

Saturday, August 30, 2014

 

Maine Firm Recalls Ribeye and Carcass Products That May Contain Specified Risk Materials SRM TSE PRION aka mad cow type disease

 


 

Friday, December 19, 2014

 

Rancho Alleged Cancerous Eyeball Case Going To Trial

 


 

Saturday, November 10, 2012

 

Wisconsin Firm Recalls Beef Tongues That May Contain Specified Risk Materials Nov 9, 2012 WI Firm Recalls Beef Tongues

 


 

Saturday, July 23, 2011

 

CATTLE HEADS WITH TONSILS, BEEF TONGUES, SPINAL CORD, SPECIFIED RISK MATERIALS (SRM's) AND PRIONS, AKA MAD COW DISEASE

 


 

Sunday, October 18, 2009

 

Wisconsin Firm Recalls Beef Tongues That Contain Prohibited Materials SRM WASHINGTON, October 17, 2009

 


 

Thursday, October 15, 2009

 

Nebraska Firm Recalls Beef Tongues That Contain Prohibited Materials SRM WASHINGTON, Oct 15, 2009

 


 

Thursday, June 26, 2008

 

Texas Firm Recalls Cattle Heads That Contain Prohibited Materials

 


 

Tuesday, July 1, 2008

 

Missouri Firm Recalls Cattle Heads That Contain Prohibited Materials SRMs

 


 

Friday, August 8, 2008

 

Texas Firm Recalls Cattle Heads That Contain Prohibited Materials SRMs 941,271 pounds with tonsils not completely removed

 


 

Saturday, April 5, 2008

 

SRM MAD COW RECALL 406 THOUSAND POUNDS CATTLE HEADS WITH TONSILS KANSAS

 


 

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

 

Consumption of beef tongue: Human BSE risk associated with exposure to lymphoid tissue in bovine tongue in consideration of new research findings

 


 

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

 

Consumption of beef tongue: Human BSE risk associated with exposure to lymphoid tissue in bovine tongue in consideration of new research findings

 


 

Friday, October 15, 2010

 

BSE infectivity in the absence of detectable PrPSc accumulation in the tongue and nasal mucosa of terminally diseased cattle

 


 

SPECIFIED RISK MATERIALS SRMs

 


 

Thursday, November 18, 2010

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VS GALEN J. NIEHUES FAKED MAD COW FEED TEST ON 92 BSE INSPECTION REPORTS FOR APPROXIMATELY 100 CATTLE OPERATIONS

 

Dustin Douglass was indicted and charged with making a fraudulent application to the VA, in an effort to obtain benefits from injuries Douglas represented he suffered while deployed in Iraq. Based on his application, the VA provided benefits totaling $22,148.53. Douglass claimed he suffered various injuries and illnesses as a result of his service in combat. The investigation revealed Douglass had, in fact, been deployed to Iraq, but had served as a computer specialist, had never been in combat, and did not suffer the service-related injuries and illnesses he claimed to have suffered. Douglass was placed on supervised release for 3 years, and required to pay $22,148.53 in restitution. Galen Niehues, an inspector for the Nebraska Department of Agriculture, (NDA), was convicted of mail fraud for submitting falsified reports to his employer concerning inspections he was supposed to perform at Nebraska cattle operations. Niehues was tasked with performing inspections of Nebraska ranches, cattle and feed for the presence of neurological diseases in cattle including Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), also known as “Mad Cow Disease”. Niehues was to identify cattle producers, perform on-site inspections of the farm sites and cattle operations, ask producers specific questions about feed, and take samples of the feed. Niehues was to then submit feed samples for laboratory analysis, and complete reports of his inspections and submit them to the NDA and to the Federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA). An investigation by the FDA and NDA revealed Niehues had fabricated approximately 100 BSE inspections and inspection reports. When confronted, Niehues admitted his reports were fraudulent, and that had fabricated the reports and feed samples he submitted to the NDA. Niehues received a sentence of 5 years probation, a 3-year term of supervised release, and was required to pay $42,812.10 in restitution.

 


 


 

Date: June 21, 2007 at 2:49 pm PST

 

Owner and Corporation Plead Guilty to Defrauding Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) Surveillance Program

 

An Arizona meat processing company and its owner pled guilty in February 2007 to charges of theft of Government funds, mail fraud, and wire fraud. The owner and his company defrauded the BSE Surveillance Program when they falsified BSE Surveillance Data Collection Forms and then submitted payment requests to USDA for the services. In addition to the targeted sample population (those cattle that were more than 30 months old or had other risk factors for BSE), the owner submitted to USDA, or caused to be submitted, BSE obex (brain stem) samples from healthy USDA-inspected cattle. As a result, the owner fraudulently received approximately $390,000. Sentencing is scheduled for May 2007.

 

snip...

 

Topics that will be covered in ongoing or planned reviews under Goal 1 include:

 

soundness of BSE maintenance sampling (APHIS),

 

implementation of Performance-Based Inspection System enhancements for specified risk material (SRM) violations and improved inspection controls over SRMs (FSIS and APHIS),

 

snip...

 

The findings and recommendations from these efforts will be covered in future semiannual reports as the relevant audits and investigations are completed.

 

4 USDA OIG SEMIANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS FY 2007 1st Half

 


 

-MORE Office of the United States Attorney District of Arizona

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For Information Contact Public Affairs

 

February 16, 2007 WYN HORNBUCKLE Telephone: (602) 514-7625 Cell: (602) 525-2681

 

CORPORATION AND ITS PRESIDENT PLEAD GUILTY TO DEFRAUDING GOVERNMENT’S MAD COW DISEASE SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM

 

PHOENIX -- Farm Fresh Meats, Inc. and Roland Emerson Farabee, 55, of Maricopa, Arizona, pleaded guilty to stealing $390,000 in government funds, mail fraud and wire fraud, in federal district court in Phoenix. U.S. Attorney Daniel Knauss stated, “The integrity of the system that tests for mad cow disease relies upon the honest cooperation of enterprises like Farm Fresh Meats. Without that honest cooperation, consumers both in the U.S. and internationally are at risk. We want to thank the USDA’s Office of Inspector General for their continuing efforts to safeguard the public health and enforce the law.” Farm Fresh Meats and Farabee were charged by Information with theft of government funds, mail fraud and wire fraud. According to the Information, on June 7, 2004, Farabee, on behalf of Farm Fresh Meats, signed a contract with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (the “USDA Agreement”) to collect obex samples from cattle at high risk of mad cow disease (the “Targeted Cattle Population”). The Targeted Cattle Population consisted of the following cattle: cattle over thirty months of age; nonambulatory cattle; cattle exhibiting signs of central nervous system disorders; cattle exhibiting signs of mad cow disease; and dead cattle. Pursuant to the USDA Agreement, the USDA agreed to pay Farm Fresh Meats $150 per obex sample for collecting obex samples from cattle within the Targeted Cattle Population, and submitting the obex samples to a USDA laboratory for mad cow disease testing. Farm Fresh Meats further agreed to maintain in cold storage the sampled cattle carcasses and heads until the test results were received by Farm Fresh Meats.

 

Evidence uncovered during the government’s investigation established that Farm Fresh Meats and Farabee submitted samples from cattle outside the Targeted Cattle Population. Specifically, Farm Fresh Meats and Farabee submitted, or caused to be submitted, obex samples from healthy, USDA inspected cattle, in order to steal government moneys.

 

Evidence collected also demonstrated that Farm Fresh Meats and Farabee failed to maintain cattle carcasses and heads pending test results and falsified corporate books and records to conceal their malfeasance. Such actions, to the extent an obex sample tested positive (fortunately, none did), could have jeopardized the USDA’s ability to identify the diseased animal and pinpoint its place of origin. On Wednesday, February 14, 2007, Farm Fresh Meats and Farabee pleaded guilty to stealing government funds and using the mails and wires to effect the scheme. According to their guilty pleas:

 

(a) Farm Fresh Meats collected, and Farabee directed others to collect, obex samples from cattle outside the Targeted Cattle Population, which were not subject to payment by the USDA;

 

(b) Farm Fresh Meats 2 and Farabee caused to be submitted payment requests to the USDA knowing that the requests were based on obex samples that were not subject to payment under the USDA Agreement;

 

(c) Farm Fresh Meats completed and submitted, and Farabee directed others to complete and submit, BSE Surveillance Data Collection Forms to the USDA’s testing laboratory that were false and misleading;

 

(d) Farm Fresh Meats completed and submitted, and Farabee directed others to complete and submit, BSE Surveillance Submission Forms filed with the USDA that were false and misleading;

 

(e) Farm Fresh Meats falsified, and Farabee directed others to falsify, internal Farm Fresh Meats documents to conceal the fact that Farm Fresh Meats was seeking and obtaining payment from the USDA for obex samples obtained from cattle outside the Targeted Cattle Population; and

 

(f) Farm Fresh Meats failed to comply with, and Farabee directed others to fail to comply with, the USDA Agreement by discarding cattle carcasses and heads prior to receiving BSE test results. A conviction for theft of government funds carries a maximum penalty of 10 years imprisonment. Mail fraud and wire fraud convictions carry a maximum penalty of 20 years imprisonment. Convictions for the above referenced violations also carry a maximum fine of $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for organizations. In determining an actual sentence, Judge Earl H. Carroll will consult the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, which provide appropriate sentencing ranges. The judge, however, is not bound by those guidelines in determining a sentence.

 

Sentencing is set before Judge Earl H. Carroll on May 14, 2007. The investigation in this case was conducted by Assistant Special Agent in Charge Alejandro Quintero, United States Department of Agriculture, Office of Inspector General. The prosecution is being handled by Robert Long, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona, Phoenix. CASE NUMBER: CR-07-00160-PHX-EHC RELEASE NUMBER: 2007-051(Farabee) # # #

 


 

WE can only hope that this is a single incident. BUT i have my doubts. I remember when the infamous TOKEN Purina Feed Mill in Texas was feeding up to 5.5 grams of potentially and probably tainted BANNED RUMINANT feed to cattle, and the FDA was bragging at the time that the amount of potentially BANNED product was so little and the cattle were so big ;

 

"It is important to note that the prohibited material was domestic in origin (therefore not likely to contain infected material because there is no evidence of BSE in U.S. cattle), fed at a very low level, and fed only once. The potential risk of BSE to such cattle is therefore exceedingly low, even if the feed were contaminated."

 


 

On Friday, April 30 th , the Food and Drug Administration learned that a cow with central nervous system symptoms had been killed and shipped to a processor for rendering into animal protein for use in animal feed. ... FDA's investigation showed that the animal in question had already been rendered into "meat and bone meal" (a type of protein animal feed). Over the weekend FDA was able to track down all the implicated material. That material is being held by the firm, which is cooperating fully with FDA.

 


 

WE now know all that was a lie. WE know that literally Thousands of TONS of BANNED and most likely tainted product is still going out to commerce. WE know now and we knew then that .005 to a gram was lethal. WE know that CWD infected deer and elk, scrapie infected sheep, BSE and BASE infected cattle have all been rendered and fed back to livestock (including cattle) for human and animal consumption.

 

Paul Brown, known and respected TSE scientist, former TSE expert for the CDC said he had ''absolutely no confidence in USDA tests before one year ago'', and this was on March 15, 2006 ;

 

"The fact the Texas cow showed up fairly clearly implied the existence of other undetected cases," Dr. Paul Brown, former medical director of the National Institutes of Health's Laboratory for Central Nervous System Studies and an expert on mad cow-like diseases, told United Press International. "The question was, 'How many?' and we still can't answer that."

 

Brown, who is preparing a scientific paper based on the latest two mad cow cases to estimate the maximum number of infected cows that occurred in the United States, said he has "absolutely no confidence in USDA tests before one year ago" because of the agency's reluctance to retest the Texas cow that initially tested positive.

 

USDA officials finally retested the cow and confirmed it was infected seven months later, but only at the insistence of the agency's inspector general.

 

"Everything they did on the Texas cow makes everything USDA did before 2005 suspect," Brown said. ...snip...end

 


 

CDC - Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy and Variant Creutzfeldt ... Dr. Paul Brown is Senior Research Scientist in the Laboratory of Central Nervous System ... Address for correspondence: Paul Brown, Building 36, Room 4A-05, ...

 


 

PAUL BROWN COMMENT TO ME ON THIS ISSUE

 

Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:10 AM

 

"Actually, Terry, I have been critical of the USDA handling of the mad cow issue for some years, and with Linda Detwiler and others sent lengthy detailed critiques and recommendations to both the USDA and the Canadian Food Agency."

 

OR, what the Honorable Phyllis Fong of the OIG found ;

 

Finding 2 Inherent Challenges in Identifying and Testing High-Risk Cattle Still Remain

 


 

Thursday, November 28, 2013

 

Department of Justice Former Suppliers of Beef to National School Lunch Program Settle Allegations of Improper Practices and Mistreating Cows

 


 

seems USDA NSLP et al thought that it would be alright, to feed our children all across the USA, via the NSLP, DEAD STOCK DOWNER COWS, the most high risk cattle for mad cow type disease, and other dangerous pathogens, and they did this for 4 years, that was documented, then hid what they did by having a recall, one of the largest recalls ever, and they made this recall and masked the reason for the recall due to animal abuse (I do not condone animal abuse), not for the reason of the potential for these animals to have mad cow BSE type disease (or other dangerous and deadly pathogens). these TSE prion disease can lay dormant for 5, 10, 20 years, or longer, WHO WILL WATCH OUR CHILDREN FOR THE NEXT 5 DECADES FOR CJD ???

 

Saturday, September 21, 2013

 

Westland/Hallmark: 2008 Beef Recall A Case Study by The Food Industry Center January 2010 THE FLIM-FLAM REPORT

 


 

DID YOUR CHILD CONSUME SOME OF THESE DEAD STOCK DOWNER COWS, THE MOST HIGH RISK FOR MAD COW DISEASE ??? this recall was not for the welfare of the animals. ...tss you can check and see here ; (link now dead, does not work...tss)

 


 

try this link ;

 


 

Sunday, November 13, 2011

 

*** California BSE mad cow beef recall, QFC, CJD, and dead stock downer livestock

 


 

Friday, January 30, 2015

 

*** Scrapie: a particularly persistent pathogen ***

 


 

Monday, October 10, 2011

 

EFSA Journal 2011 The European Response to BSE: A Success Story

 

snip...

 

EFSA and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) recently delivered a scientific opinion on any possible epidemiological or molecular association between TSEs in animals and humans (EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) and ECDC, 2011). This opinion confirmed Classical BSE prions as the only TSE agents demonstrated to be zoonotic so far

 

*** but the possibility that a small proportion of human cases so far classified as "sporadic" CJD are of zoonotic origin could not be excluded.

 

*** Moreover, transmission experiments to non-human primates suggest that some TSE agents in addition to Classical BSE prions in cattle (namely L-type Atypical BSE, Classical BSE in sheep, transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) and chronic wasting disease (CWD) agents) might have zoonotic potential.

 

snip...

 


 


 

Thursday, August 12, 2010

 

Seven main threats for the future linked to prions

 

First threat

 

The TSE road map defining the evolution of European policy for protection against prion diseases is based on a certain numbers of hypotheses some of which may turn out to be erroneous. In particular, a form of BSE (called atypical Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy), recently identified by systematic testing in aged cattle without clinical signs, may be the origin of classical BSE and thus potentially constitute a reservoir, which may be impossible to eradicate if a sporadic origin is confirmed.

 

*** Also, a link is suspected between atypical BSE and some apparently sporadic cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in humans.

 

*** These atypical BSE cases constitute an unforeseen first threat that could sharply modify the European approach to prion diseases.

 

Second threat

 

snip...

 


 

Subject: *** Becky Lockhart 46, Utah’s first female House speaker, dies diagnosed with the extremely rare Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease aka mad cow type disease

 

what is CJD ? just ask USDA inc., and the OIE, they are still feeding the public and the media industry fed junk science that is 30 years old.

 

why doesn’t some of you try reading the facts, instead of rubber stamping everything the USDA inc says.

 

sporadic CJD has now been linked to BSE aka mad cow disease, Scrapie, and there is much concern now for CWD and risk factor for humans.

 

My sincere condolences to the family and friends of the House Speaker Becky Lockhart. I am deeply saddened hear this.

 

with that said, with great respect, I must ask each and every one of you Politicians that are so deeply saddened to hear of this needless death of the Honorable House Speaker Becky Lockhart, really, cry me a friggen river. I am seriously going to ask you all this...I have been diplomatic for about 17 years and it has got no where. people are still dying. so, are you all stupid or what??? how many more need to die ??? how much is global trade of beef and other meat products that are not tested for the TSE prion disease, how much and how many bodies is this market worth?

 

Saturday, January 17, 2015

 

*** Becky Lockhart 46, Utah’s first female House speaker, dies diagnosed with the extremely rare Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease

 


 

Thursday, January 15, 2015

 

41-year-old Navy Commander with sporadic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease CJD TSE Prion: Case Report

 


 

Wednesday, December 31, 2014

 

NASDA BSE, CWD, SCRAPIE, TSE, PRION, Policy Statements updated with amendments passed during the NASDA Annual Meeting Updated September 18, 2014

 


 

Sunday, December 28, 2014

 

CHRONIC WASTING DISEASE CWD TSE PRION DISEASE AKA MAD DEER DISIEASE USDA USAHA INC DECEMBER 28, 2014

 


 

*** HUMAN MAD COW DISEASE nvCJD TEXAS CASE NOT LINKED TO EUROPEAN TRAVEL CDC ***

 

Sunday, November 23, 2014

 

*** Confirmed Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (variant CJD) Case in Texas in June 2014 confirmed as USA case NOT European

 

the patient had resided in Kuwait, Russia and Lebanon. The completed investigation did not support the patient's having had extended travel to European countries, including the United Kingdom, or travel to Saudi Arabia. The specific overseas country where this patient’s infection occurred is less clear largely because the investigation did not definitely link him to a country where other known vCJD cases likely had been infected.

 


 

Sunday, December 14, 2014

 

ALERT new variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease nvCJD or vCJD, sporadic CJD strains, TSE prion aka Mad Cow Disease United States of America Update December 14, 2014 Report

 


 

Sunday, February 08, 2015

 

FDA SCIENCE BOARD TO THE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION BOVINE HEPARIN BSE CJD TSE PRION Wednesday, June 4, 2014

 


 

Thursday, January 22, 2015

 

Transmission properties of atypical Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: a clue to disease etiology?

 


 

Sunday, January 11, 2015

 

Docket No. APHIS-2014-0107 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; Importation of Animals and Animal Products Singeltary Submission

 


 

 

 

This is a Comment on the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Notice: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; Importation of Animals and Animal Products

 

For related information, Open Docket Folder Docket folder icon

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Show agency attachment(s) AttachmentsView All (0) Empty

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Comment View document:Docket No. APHIS-2014-0107 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; Importation of Animals and Animal Products Singeltary Submission ;

 

I believe that there is more risk to the world from Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE prion aka mad cow type disease now, coming from the United States and all of North America, than there is risk coming to the USA and North America, from other Countries. I am NOT saying I dont think there is any risk for the BSE type TSE prion coming from other Countries, I am just saying that in 2015, why is the APHIS/USDA/FSIS/FDA still ignoring these present mad cow risk factors in North America like they are not here?

 

North America has more strains of TSE prion disease, in more species (excluding zoo animals in the early BSE days, and excluding the Feline TSE and or Canine TSE, because they dont look, and yes, there has been documented evidence and scientific studies, and DEFRA Hound study, that shows the canine spongiform encephalopathy is very possible, if it has not already happened, just not documented), then any other Country in the world. Mink TME, Deer Elk cervid CWD (multiple strains), cBSE cattle, atypical L-type BSE cattle, atypical H-type BSE cattle, atyical HG type BSE cow (the only cow documented in the world to date with this strain), typical sheep goat Scrapie (multiple strains), and the atypical Nor-98 Scrapie, which has been linked to sporadic CJD, Nor-98 atypical Scrapie has spread from coast to coast. sporadic CJD on the rise, with different strains mounting, victims becoming younger, with the latest nvCJD human mad cow case being documented in Texas again, this case, NOT LINKED TO EUROPEAN TRAVEL CDC.

 

typical BSE can propagate as nvCJD and or sporadic CJD (Collinge et al), and sporadic CJD has now been linked to atypical BSE, Scrapie and atypical Scrapie, and scientist are very concerned with CWD TSE prion in the Cervid populations. in my opinion, the BSE MRR policy, which overtook the BSE GBR risk assessments for each country, and then made BSE confirmed countries legal to trade mad cow disease, which was all brought forth AFTER that fateful day December 23, 2003, when the USA lost its gold card i.e. BSE FREE status, thats the day it all started. once the BSE MRR policy was shoved down every countries throat by USDA inc and the OIE, then the legal trading of Scrapie was validated to be a legal trading commodity, also shoved through by the USDA inc and the OIE, the world then lost 30 years of attempted eradication of the BSE TSE prion disease typical and atypical strains, and the BSE TSE Prion aka mad cow type disease was thus made a legal trading commodity, like it or not. its all about money now folks, trade, to hell with human health with a slow incubating disease, that is 100% fatal once clinical, and forget the fact of exposure, sub-clinical infection, and friendly fire there from i.e. iatrogenic TSE prion disease, the pass it forward mode of the TSE PRION aka mad cow type disease. its all going to be sporadic CJD or sporadic ffi, or sporadic gss, or now the infamous VPSPr. ...problem solved $$$

 

the USDA/APHIS/FSIS/FDA triple mad cow BSE firewall, well, that was nothing but ink on paper.

 

for this very reason I believe the BSE MRR policy is a total failure, and that this policy should be immediately withdrawn, and set back in place the BSE GBR Risk Assessments, with the BSE GBR risk assessments set up to monitor all TSE PRION disease in all species of animals, and that the BSE GBR risk assessments be made stronger than before.

 

lets start with the recent notice that beef from Ireland will be coming to America.

 

Ireland confirmed around 1655 cases of mad cow disease. with the highest year confirming about 333 cases in 2002, with numbers of BSE confirmed cases dropping from that point on, to a documentation of 1 confirmed case in 2013, to date. a drastic decrease in the feeding of cows to cows i.e. the ruminant mad cow feed ban, and the enforcement of that ban, has drastically reduced the number of BSE cases in Europe, minus a few BABs or BARBs. a far cry from the USDA FDA triple BSE firewall, which was nothing more than ink on paper, where in 2007, in one week recall alone, some 10 MILLION POUNDS OF BANNED POTENTIAL MAD COW FEED WENT OUT INTO COMMERCE IN THE USA. this is 10 years post feed ban. in my honest opinion, due to the blatant cover up of BSE TSE prion aka mad cow disease in the USA, we still have no clue as to the true number of cases of BSE mad cow disease in the USA or North America as a whole. ...just saying.

 

Number of reported cases of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) in farmed cattle worldwide* (excluding the United Kingdom)

 

Country/Year

 

snip...please see attached pdf file, with references of breaches in the USA triple BSE mad cow firewalls, and recent science on the TSE prion disease. ...TSS No documents available. AttachmentsView All (1) Empty Docket No. APHIS-2014-0107 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; Importation of Animals and Animal Products Singeltary Submission View Attachment:

 


 

Sunday, January 11, 2015

 

Docket No. APHIS-2014-0107 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; Importation of Animals and Animal Products Singeltary Submission

 


 

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

 

*** Could we spot the next BSE?, asks BVA President ***

 


 

UK EXPORTS OF MBM TO WORLD

 


 


 


 

OTHERS

 

BEEF AND VEAL

 


 


 


 

LIVE CATTLE

 


 

FATS

 


 

EMBRYOS

 


 

GELATIN ETC

 


 

SEMEN

 


 

MEAT

 


 

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

 

COOL UPDATE September 2, 2014

 


 

 TSS

 

Monday, February 23, 2015

 

20th BSE Case Raises New Concerns about Canada's Feeding Practices and Voluntary Testing Program; Highlights Importance of COOL

 


 

Wednesday, February 18, 2015

OIE Bovine spongiform encephalopathy ,Canada

Bovine spongiform encephalopathy ,Canada


Information received on 18/02/2015 from Dr Martine Dubuc, OIE Delegate for Canada, Chief Food Safety Officer Vice-President, Science Branch, Health Ministry, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Canada

Summary


Report type
Immediate notification
Date of start of the event
04/02/2015
Date of pre-confirmation of the event
07/02/2015
Report date
18/02/2015
Date submitted to OIE
18/02/2015
Reason for notification
Reoccurrence of a listed disease
Date of previous occurrence
02/2011
Manifestation of disease
Sub-clinical infection
Causal agent
C-type BSE (classical)
Nature of diagnosis
Laboratory (advanced)
This event pertains to
a defined zone within the country

New outbreaks


Summary of outbreaks
Total outbreaks: 1
Outbreak Location
  • ALBERTA ( Edmonton )
Total animals affected
Species
Susceptible
Cases
Deaths
Destroyed
Slaughtered
Cattle

1
0
1
0
Outbreak statistics
Species
Apparent morbidity rate
Apparent mortality rate
Apparent case fatality rate
Proportion susceptible animals lost*
Cattle
**
**
0.00%
**

* Removed from the susceptible population through death, destruction and/or slaughter;
** Not calculated because of missing information;

Epidemiology


Source of the outbreak(s) or origin of infection
  • Unknown or inconclusive
Epidemiological comments
On 4 February 2015, a private veterinarian visited a farm reporting a downer (non-ambulatory) cow and took samples as part of the national surveillance program for BSE in Canada. Rapid tests conducted at the provincial laboratory in Edmonton, Alberta were non-negative which was reported to Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) on 7 February 2015. These results were confirmed by CFIA's OIE BSE reference laboratory in Lethbridge, Alberta on 11 February 2015 as a classical case of BSE.

The carcass was held and did not enter the human food or animal feed chains. The ongoing investigation has identified the herd of origin and the cow's birth date of March 2009. Movement controls and quarantines have been put in place pending completion of the investigation.

The detection of a BSE case in Canada underscores the ongoing effectiveness of Canada's robust targeted BSE surveillance program. Canada continues to have in place an enhanced feed ban that includes strict controls for the exclusion of specified risk materials from the entire animal feed chain and fertilizers.

Control measures


Measures applied
  • Stamping out
  • Quarantine
  • Screening
  • No vaccination
  • No treatment of affected animals
Measures to be applied
  • No other measures

Diagnostic test results


Laboratory name and type
Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development ( Local laboratory )
Tests and results
Species
Test
Test date
Result
Cattle
antigen (Ag) detection ELISA
07/02/2015
Positive
Laboratory name and type
BSE Reference Laboratory (CFIA-Lethbridge) ( OIE’s Reference Laboratory )
Tests and results
Species
Test
Test date
Result
Cattle
antigen (Ag) detection ELISA
10/02/2015
Positive
Cattle
rapid tests
10/02/2015
Positive
Cattle
western blot
11/02/2015
Positive

Future Reporting


The event is continuing. Weekly follow-up reports will be submitted.




Encéphalopathie spongiforme bovine ,Canada


Information reçue le 18/02/2015 de Dr Martine Dubuc, OIE Delegate for Canada, Chief Food Safety Officer Vice-President, Science Branch, Health Ministry, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Canada

Résumé


Type de rapport
Notification immédiate
Date de début de l’événement
04/02/2015
Date de pré-confirmation de l´événement
07/02/2015
Date du rapport
18/02/2015
Date d'envoi à l'OIE
18/02/2015
Raison de notification
Réapparition d’une maladie listée par l'OIE
Date de la précédente apparition de la maladie
02/2011
Manifestation de la maladie
Infection sub-clinique
Agent causal
ESB type-C (classique)
Nature du diagnostic
Tests approfondis en laboratoire (i.e. virologie, microscopie électronique, biologie moléculaire, immunologie)
Cet événement se rapporte à
une zone définie à l'intérieur du pays

Nouveaux foyers


Récapitulatif des foyers
Nombre total de foyers : 1
Localisation du foyer
  • ALBERTA ( Edmonton )
Nombre total d'animaux atteints
Espèce(s)
Sensibles
Cas
Morts
Détruits
Abattus
Bovins

1
0
1
0
Statistiques sur le foyer
Espèce(s)
Taux de morbidité apparent
Taux de mortalité apparent
Taux de fatalité apparent
Proportion d'animaux sensibles perdus*
Bovins
**
**
0.00%
**

* Soustraits de la population sensible suite à la mort, à l´abattage et/ou à la destruction;
** Non calculé par manque de données;

Epidémiologie


Source du/des foyer(s) ou origine de l´infection
  • Inconnue ou incertaine
Autres renseignements épidémiologiques / Commentaires
Le 4 février 2015, un vétérinaire privé avait visité un élevage ayant informé d’une vache incapable de marcher (non ambulatoire) et avait prélevé des échantillons dans le cadre du Programme national de surveillance de l’ESB au Canada. Des tests de détection rapide effectués au Laboratoire provincial à Edmonton, Alberta, avaient été non négatifs, ce qui avait été notifié à l’Agence canadienne d’inspection des aliments (ACIA) le 7 février 2015. Ces résultats avaient été confirmés comme étant un cas d’ESB classique par le Laboratoire de référence de l’OIE pour l’ESB de l’ACIA à Lethbridge, Alberta, le 11 février 2015.

La carcasse avait été retenue et n’avait entrée dans la chaine alimentaire humaine ou animale. L’enquête en cours a identifié le troupeau d’origine et mars 2009 comme étant la date de naissance de la vache. Des mesures de restriction des déplacements et de quarantaine sont en place jusqu’à l’achèvement de l’enquête.

La détection d’un cas d’ESB au Canada met en évidence l’actuelle efficacité du solide programme de surveillance de l’ESB ciblé du Canada. Le Canada maintient en vigueur une interdiction renforcée sur les aliments du bétail qui comprend des contrôles stricts pour l'exclusion des matériels à risque spécifiés de la chaîne alimentaire animale et des engrais.

Mesures de lutte


Mesure de lutte appliquées
  • Abattage sanitaire
  • Quarantaine
  • Dépistage
  • Pas de vaccination
  • Aucun traitement des animaux atteints
Mesures à appliquer
  • Aucune autre mesure

Résultats des tests de diagnostics


Nom du laboratoire et type
Laboratoire de référence pour l'ESB (ACIA-Lethbridge) ( Laboratoire de référence de l’OIE )
Tests et résultats
Espèce(s)
Test
Date du test
Résultat
Bovins
test de détection rapide
10/02/2015
Positif
Bovins
tests ELISA de détection de l'antigène
10/02/2015
Positif
Bovins
western blot
11/02/2015
Positif
Nom du laboratoire et type
Ministère de l'Agriculture et du Développement rural de l'Alberta ( Laboratoire local )
Tests et résultats
Espèce(s)
Test
Date du test
Résultat
Bovins
tests ELISA de détection de l'antigène
07/02/2015
Positif

Rapports futurs


Cet événement se poursuit. Des rapports de suivi hebdomadaires devront être envoyés.




Encefalopatía espongiforme bovina ,Canadá


Información recibida el 18/02/2015 desde Dr Martine Dubuc, OIE Delegate for Canada, Chief Food Safety Officer Vice-President, Science Branch, Health Ministry, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Ottawa, Canadá

Resumen


Tipo de informe
Notificación inmediata
Fecha del inicio del evento
04/02/2015
Fecha de pre-confirmación del evento
07/02/2015
Fecha del informe
18/02/2015
Fecha de envio del informe a la OIE
18/02/2015
Motivo de la notificación
Reaparición de una enfermedad de la Lista de la OIE
Fecha de la anterior aparición de la enfermedad
02/2011
Manifestación de la enfermedad
Infección sub-clínica
Agente causal
EEB tipo-C (clásica)
Naturaleza del diagnóstico
Pruebas de diagnóstico de laboratorio avanzadas (ej. virología, microscopía electrónica, biología molecular e inmunología)
Este evento concierne
una zona definida dentro del país

Nuevos focos


Resumen de los focos
Número total de focos: 1
Localización del foco
  • ALBERTA ( Edmonton )
Número total de animales afectados
Especies
Susceptibles
Casos
Muertos
Destruidos
Sacrificados
Bovinos

1
0
1
0
Estadística del foco
Especies
Tasa de morbilidad aparente
Tasa de mortalidad aparente
Tasa de fatalidad aparente
Proporción de animales susceptibles perdidos*
Bovinos
**
**
0.00%
**

* Descontados de la población susceptible a raíz de su muerte, destrucción o sacrificio;
** No calculado por falta de datos;

Epidemiología


Fuente del o de los focos u origen de la infección
  • Desconocida o no concluyente
Otros detalles epidemiológicos / comentarios
El 4 de febrero de 2015, un veterinario privado visitó una explotación que había informado de una vaca incapaz de andar (no ambulatoria) y tomó muestras dentro del Programa nacional de vigilancia de la EEB en Canadá. Las pruebas rápidas efectuadas en el Laboratorio provincial en Edmonton, Alberta, fueron no negativas, de lo cual se informó a la Agencia canadiense de inspección de alimentos (CFIA) el 7 de febrero de 2015. Esos resultados fueron confirmados como un caso de EEB clásica por el Laboratorio de referencia de la OIE para la EEB de la CFIA en Lethbridge, Alberta, el 11 de febrero de 2015.

La carcasa se retuvo y no entró en la cadena alimentaria humana o animal. La investigación en curso ha identificado la manada de origen y marzo de 2009 como la fecha de nacimiento de la vaca. Están en vigor medidas de restricción de los desplazamientos y de cuarentena hasta la finalización de la investigación.

La detección de un caso de EEB en Canadá pone de relieve la actual eficacia del sólido programa de vigilancia de la EEB específico de Canadá. Canadá mantiene en vigor una prohibición reforzada relativa a los piensos que incluye controles estrictos para la exclusión de los materiales de riesgo especificados de la cadena alimentaria animal y de los abonos.

Medidas de Control


Medidas implementadas
  • Sacrificio sanitario
  • Cuarentena
  • Tamizaje
  • Vacunación: no
  • Ningún tratamiento de los animales afectados
Medidas para implementar
  • Ninguna otra medida

Resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas


Nombre y tipo de laboratorio
Laboratorio de referencia para la EEB (CFIA-Lethbridge) ( Laboratorio de referencia de la OIE )
Pruebas y resultados
Especies
Prueba
Fecha de la prueba
Resultados
Bovinos
prueba ELISA de detección del antígeno
10/02/2015
Positivo
Bovinos
prueba rápida
10/02/2015
Positivo
Bovinos
western blot
11/02/2015
Positivo
Nombre y tipo de laboratorio
Ministerio de agricultura y desarrollo rural de Alberta ( Laboratorio local )
Pruebas y resultados
Especies
Prueba
Fecha de la prueba
Resultados
Bovinos
prueba ELISA de detección del antígeno
07/02/2015
Positivo

Informes futuros


El episodio continúa. Informes de seguimiento semanales serán enviados




<!--[endif]—>

 


 

Saturday, February 14, 2015

Canadian Food Inspection Agency Confirms Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) in Alberta
 Could we spot the next BSE?, asks BVA President
 
 


 

Friday, February 20, 2015

 

A BSE CANADIAN COW MAD COW UPDATE Transcript - Briefing (February 18, 2015)

 

 
 

 

TSS