Journal of Veterinary Medical Science Article ID: 16-0068
Language: English Japanese Previous Article | Next Article
Advance Publication
Coexistence of two forms of disease-associated prion protein in
extracerebral tissues of cattle infected with H-type bovine spongiform
encephalopathy
Hiroyuki OKADA1), Kohtaro MIYAZAWA1), Kentaro MASUJIN1), Takashi YOKOYAMA1)
1) National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research
Organization (NARO)
[Advance Publication] Released 2016/03/24
Keywords: atypical BSE, extracerebral tissues, H-type, peripheral nervous
system, prion Full Text PDF [834K] Abstracts
H-type bovine spongiform encephalopathy (H-BSE) is an atypical form of BSE
in aged cattle. H-BSE is characterized by the presence of two proteinase
K-resistant forms of disease-associated prion protein (PrPSc), identified as
PrPSc #1 and PrPSc #2, in the brain. To investigate the coexistence of different
PrPSc forms in the extracerebral tissues of cattle experimentally infected with
H-BSE, immunohistochemical and molecular analyses were performed by using
N-terminal-, core-region-, and C-terminal-specific anti-prion protein
antibodies. Our results demonstrated that two distinct forms of PrPSc coexisted
in the various extracerebral tissues.
when feed is mixed with animal protein that consist of two different BSE
TSE prion agent OR MORE, and here in the USA, even with cervid with CWD or high
risk cwd (NO BINDING REGULATIONS TO PREVENT THIS), who knows what to expect with
the end results. same with coexistence human TSE prion. please remember France
and it’s atypical BSE that has exploded compared to other countries. you can’t
explain that away with a spontaneous event...imo...terry
***atypical spontaneous BSE in France LOL***
FRANCE STOPS TESTING FOR MAD COW DISEASE BSE, and here’s why, to many
spontaneous events of mad cow disease $$$
***so 20 cases of atypical BSE in France, compared to the remaining 40
cases in the remaining 12 Countries, divided by the remaining 12 Countries,
about 3+ cases per country, besides Frances 20 cases. you cannot explain this
away with any spontaneous BSe. ...TSS
Sunday, October 5, 2014
France stops BSE testing for Mad Cow Disease
*** Singeltary reply ; Molecular, Biochemical and Genetic Characteristics
of BSE in Canada Singeltary reply ;
*** It also suggests a similar cause or source for atypical BSE in these
countries. ***
Discussion: The C, L and H type BSE cases in Canada exhibit molecular
characteristics similar to those described for classical and atypical BSE cases
from Europe and Japan.
*** This supports the theory that the importation of BSE contaminated
feedstuff is the source of C-type BSE in Canada.
*** It also suggests a similar cause or source for atypical BSE in these
countries. ***
see page 176 of 201 pages...tss
Thursday, March 24, 2016
FRANCE CONFIRMS BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY BSE MAD COW (ESB) chez une
vache dans les Ardennes
I strenuously once again urge the FDA and its industry constituents, to
make it MANDATORY that all ruminant feed be banned to all ruminants, and this
should include all cervids as soon as possible for the following
reasons...
======
In the USA, under the Food and Drug Administrations BSE Feed Regulation (21
CFR 589.2000) most material (exceptions include milk, tallow, and gelatin) from
deer and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. With regards to
feed for non-ruminant animals, under FDA law, CWD positive deer may not be used
for any animal feed or feed ingredients. For elk and deer considered at high
risk for CWD, the FDA recommends that these animals do not enter the animal feed
system.
***However, this recommendation is guidance and not a requirement by law.
======
31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT
*** Ruminant feed ban for cervids in the United States? ***
31 Jan 2015 at 20:14 GMT
Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from Deer
and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission
#158
Guidance for Industry
Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed
This version of the guidance replaces the version made available
September15, 2003.
This document has been revised to update the docket number, contact
information, and standard disclosures. Submit comments on this guidance at any
time.
Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All comments
should be identified with the Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186).
For further information regarding this guidance, contact Burt Pritchett,
Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV-222), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, 240-402-6276, E-mail:
burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov.
Additional copies of this guidance document may be requested from the
Policy and Regulations Staff (HFV-6), Center for Veterinary Medicine, Food and
Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Place, Rockville, MD 20855, and may be viewed
on the Internet at either http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/default.htm
or http://www.regulations.gov.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration
Center for Veterinary Medicine March 2016
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
2
Guidance for Industry Use of Material from Deer and Elk in Animal Feed
This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights
for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an
alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA office
responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page.
I. Introduction
Under FDA’s BSE feed regulation (21 CFR 589.2000) most material from deer
and elk is prohibited for use in feed for ruminant animals. This guidance
document describes FDA’s recommendations regarding the use in all animal feed of
all material from deer and elk that are positive for Chronic Wasting Disease
(CWD) or are considered at high risk for CWD. The potential risks from CWD to
humans or non-cervid animals such as poultry and swine are not well understood.
However, because of recent recognition that CWD is spreading rapidly in
white-tailed deer, and because CWD’s route of transmission is poorly understood,
FDA is making recommendations regarding the use in animal feed of rendered
materials from deer and elk that are CWD-positive or that are at high risk for
CWD.
In general, FDA’s guidance documents do not establish legally enforceable
responsibilities. Instead, guidances describe the Agency’s current thinking on a
topic and should be viewed only as recommendations, unless specific regulatory
or statutory requirements are cited. The use of the word should in Agency
guidances means that something is suggested or recommended, but not
required.
II. Background
CWD is a neurological (brain) disease of farmed and wild deer and elk that
belong in the animal family cervidae (cervids). Only deer and elk are known to
be susceptible to CWD by natural transmission. The disease has been found in
farmed and wild mule deer, white-tailed deer, North American elk, and in farmed
black-tailed deer. CWD belongs to a family of animal and human diseases called
transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). These include bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE or “mad cow” disease) in cattle; scrapie in sheep
and goats; and classical and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseases (CJD and vCJD)
in humans. There is no known treatment for these diseases, and there is no
vaccine to prevent them. In addition, although validated postmortem diagnostic
tests are available, there are no validated diagnostic tests for CWD that can be
used to test for the disease in live animals.
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
III. Use in animal feed of material from CWD-positive deer and elk
Material from CWD-positive animals may not be used in any animal feed or
feed ingredients. Pursuant to Sec. 402(a)(5) of the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, animal feed and feed ingredients containing material from a
CWD-positive animal would be considered adulterated. FDA recommends that any
such adulterated feed or feed ingredients be recalled or otherwise removed from
the marketplace.
IV. Use in animal feed of material from deer and elk considered at high
risk for CWD Deer and elk considered at high risk for CWD include: (1) animals
from areas declared by State officials to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD
eradication zones; and (2) deer and elk that at some time during the 60-month
period immediately before the time of slaughter were in a captive herd that
contained a CWD-positive animal.
FDA recommends that materials from deer and elk considered at high risk for
CWD no longer be entered into the animal feed system. Under present
circumstances, FDA is not recommending that feed made from deer and elk from a
non-endemic area be recalled if a State later declares the area endemic for CWD
or a CWD eradication zone. In addition, at this time, FDA is not recommending
that feed made from deer and elk believed to be from a captive herd that
contained no CWD-positive animals be recalled if that herd is subsequently found
to contain a CWD-positive animal.
V. Use in animal feed of material from deer and elk NOT considered at high
risk for CWD FDA continues to consider materials from deer and elk NOT
considered at high risk for CWD to be acceptable for use in NON-RUMINANT animal
feeds in accordance with current agency regulations, 21 CFR 589.2000. Deer and
elk not considered at high risk include: (1) deer and elk from areas not
declared by State officials to be endemic for CWD and/or to be CWD eradication
zones; and (2) deer and elk that were not at some time during the 60-month
period immediately before the time of slaughter in a captive herd that contained
a CWD-positive animal.
3
Sunday, March 20, 2016
*** Docket No. FDA-2003-D-0432 (formerly 03D-0186) Use of Material from
Deer and Elk in Animal Feed Singeltary Submission ***
IBNC Tauopathy or TSE Prion disease, it appears, no one is sure
Posted by flounder on 03 Jul 2015 at 16:53 GMT
Self-Propagative Replication of Ab Oligomers Suggests Potential
Transmissibility in Alzheimer Disease
Received July 24, 2014; Accepted September 16, 2014; Published November 3,
2014
Singeltary comment ;
Tuesday, March 15, 2016
Docket No. FDA-2016-N-0321 Risk Assessment of Foodborne Illness Associated
with Pathogens from Produce Grown in Fields Amended with Untreated Biological
Soil Amendments of Animal Origin; Request for Comments, Scientific Data, and
Information Singeltary Submission
Saturday, February 6, 2016
Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal Health; Meeting [Docket No.
APHIS-2016-0007] Singeltary Submission
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
Exportation of Live Animals, Hatching Eggs, and Animal Germplasm From the
United States [Docket No. APHIS-2012-0049] RIN 0579-AE00 2016-00962
Comment from Terry Singeltary This is a Comment on the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Proposed Rule: Scrapie in Sheep and
Goats
For related information, Open Docket Folder Docket folder icon
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Show agency attachment(s) AttachmentsView All (0)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment View document:Indeed, much science has changed about the Scrapie
TSE prion, including more science linking Scrapie to humans. sadly, politics,
industry, and trade, have not changed, and those usually trump sound science, as
is the case with all Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE Prion disease
in livestock producing animals and the OIE. we can look no further at the legal
trading of the Scrapie TSE prion both typical and atypical of all strains, and
CWD all stains. With as much science of old, and now more new science to back
this up, Scrapie of all types i.e. atypical and typical, BSE all strains, and
CWD all strains, should be regulated in trade as BSE TSE PRION. In fact, I urge
APHIS et al and the OIE, and all trading partners to take heed to the latest
science on the TSE prion disease, all of them, and seriously reconsider the
blatant disregards for human and animal health, all in the name of trade, with
the continued relaxing of TSE Prion trade regulations through the 'NEGLIGIBLE
BSE RISK' PROGRAM, which was set up to fail in the first place. If the world
does not go back to the 'BSE RISK ASSESSMENTS', enhance, and or change that
assessment process to include all TSE prion disease, i.e. 'TSE RISK ASSESSMENT',
if we do not do this and if we continue this farce with OIE and the USDA et al,
and the 'NEGLIGIBLE BSE RISK' PROGRAM, we will never eradicate the TSE prion aka
mad cow type disease, they will continue to mutate and spread among species of
human and animal origin, and they will continue to kill. ...
please see ;
O.05: Transmission of prions to primates after extended silent incubation
periods: Implications for BSE and scrapie risk assessment in human populations
Emmanuel Comoy, Jacqueline Mikol, Valerie Durand, Sophie Luccantoni,
Evelyne Correia, Nathalie Lescoutra, Capucine Dehen, and Jean-Philippe Deslys
Atomic Energy Commission; Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Prion diseases (PD) are the unique neurodegenerative proteinopathies
reputed to be transmissible under field conditions since decades. The
transmission of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) to humans evidenced that
an animal PD might be zoonotic under appropriate conditions. Contrarily, in the
absence of obvious (epidemiological or experimental) elements supporting a
transmission or genetic predispositions, PD, like the other proteinopathies, are
reputed to occur spontaneously (atpical animal prion strains, sporadic CJD
summing 80% of human prion cases). Non-human primate models provided the first
evidences supporting the transmissibiity of human prion strains and the zoonotic
potential of BSE. Among them, cynomolgus macaques brought major information for
BSE risk assessment for human health (Chen, 2014), according to their
phylogenetic proximity to humans and extended lifetime. We used this model to
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal PD from bovine, ovine and cervid
origins even after very long silent incubation periods.
*** We recently observed the direct transmission of a natural classical
scrapie isolate to macaque after a 10-year silent incubation period,
***with features similar to some reported for human cases of sporadic CJD,
albeit requiring fourfold longe incubation than BSE. Scrapie, as recently evoked
in humanized mice (Cassard, 2014),
***is the third potentially zoonotic PD (with BSE and L-type BSE),
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases. We will present an
updated panorama of our different transmission studies and discuss the
implications of such extended incubation periods on risk assessment of animal PD
for human health.
===============
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases***
===============
***This information will have a scientific impact since it is the first
study that demonstrates the transmission of scrapie to a non-human primate with
a close genetic relationship to humans. This information is especially useful to
regulatory officials and those involved with risk assessment of the potential
transmission of animal prion diseases to humans.
***This observation strengthens the questioning of the harmlessness of
scrapie to humans, at a time when protective measures for human and animal
health are being dismantled and reduced as c-BSE is considered controlled and
being eradicated. Our results underscore the importance of precautionary and
protective measures and the necessity for long-term experimental transmission
studies to assess the zoonotic potential of other animal prion strains.
please see file attachment for full submission and recent science and my
deep concerns on the TSE Prion disease... No documents available.
AttachmentsView All (1) scrapie-usa-blogspot-com View Attachment:
O.05: Transmission of prions to primates after extended silent incubation
periods: Implications for BSE and scrapie risk assessment in human populations
Emmanuel Comoy, Jacqueline Mikol, Valerie Durand, Sophie Luccantoni,
Evelyne Correia, Nathalie Lescoutra, Capucine Dehen, and Jean-Philippe Deslys
Atomic Energy Commission; Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
Prion diseases (PD) are the unique neurodegenerative proteinopathies
reputed to be transmissible under field conditions since decades. The
transmission of Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE) to humans evidenced that
an animal PD might be zoonotic under appropriate conditions. Contrarily, in the
absence of obvious (epidemiological or experimental) elements supporting a
transmission or genetic predispositions, PD, like the other proteinopathies, are
reputed to occur spontaneously (atpical animal prion strains, sporadic CJD
summing 80% of human prion cases). Non-human primate models provided the first
evidences supporting the transmissibiity of human prion strains and the zoonotic
potential of BSE. Among them, cynomolgus macaques brought major information for
BSE risk assessment for human health (Chen, 2014), according to their
phylogenetic proximity to humans and extended lifetime. We used this model to
assess the zoonotic potential of other animal PD from bovine, ovine and cervid
origins even after very long silent incubation periods.
*** We recently observed the direct transmission of a natural classical
scrapie isolate to macaque after a 10-year silent incubation period,
***with features similar to some reported for human cases of sporadic CJD,
albeit requiring fourfold long incubation than BSE. Scrapie, as recently evoked
in humanized mice (Cassard, 2014),
***is the third potentially zoonotic PD (with BSE and L-type BSE),
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases.
We will present an updated panorama of our different transmission studies
and discuss the implications of such extended incubation periods on risk
assessment of animal PD for human health.
===============
***thus questioning the origin of human sporadic cases***
===============
***Our study demonstrates susceptibility of adult cattle to oral
transmission of classical BSE. ***
***our findings suggest that possible transmission risk of H-type BSE to
sheep and human. ***
P.86: Estimating the risk of transmission of BSE and scrapie to ruminants
and humans by protein misfolding cyclic amplification
Morikazu Imamura, Naoko Tabeta, Yoshifumi Iwamaru, and Yuichi Murayama
National Institute of Animal Health; Tsukuba, Japan
To assess the risk of the transmission of ruminant prions to ruminants and
humans at the molecular level, we investigated the ability of abnormal prion
protein (PrPSc) of typical and atypical BSEs (L-type and H-type) and typical
scrapie to convert normal prion protein (PrPC) from bovine, ovine, and human to
proteinase K-resistant PrPSc-like form (PrPres) using serial protein misfolding
cyclic amplification (PMCA).
Six rounds of serial PMCA was performed using 10% brain homogenates from
transgenic mice expressing bovine, ovine or human PrPC in combination with PrPSc
seed from typical and atypical BSE- or typical scrapie-infected brain
homogenates from native host species. In the conventional PMCA, the conversion
of PrPC to PrPres was observed only when the species of PrPC source and PrPSc
seed matched. However, in the PMCA with supplements (digitonin, synthetic polyA
and heparin), both bovine and ovine PrPC were converted by PrPSc from all tested
prion strains. On the other hand, human PrPC was converted by PrPSc from typical
and H-type BSE in this PMCA condition.
Although these results were not compatible with the previous reports
describing the lack of transmissibility of H-type BSE to ovine and human
transgenic mice,
***our findings suggest that possible transmission risk of H-type BSE to
sheep and human.
Bioassay will be required to determine whether the PMCA products are
infectious to these animals.
================
==========================================
PRION 2015 CONFERENCE FT. COLLINS CWD RISK FACTORS TO HUMANS
*** LATE-BREAKING ABSTRACTS PRION 2015 CONFERENCE ***
O18
Zoonotic Potential of CWD Prions
Liuting Qing1, Ignazio Cali1,2, Jue Yuan1, Shenghai Huang3, Diane Kofskey1,
Pierluigi Gambetti1, Wenquan Zou1, Qingzhong Kong1 1Case Western Reserve
University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA, 2Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy,
3Encore Health Resources, Houston, Texas, USA
*** These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect
human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic
human carriers of CWD infection.
==================
***These results indicate that the CWD prion has the potential to infect
human CNS and peripheral lymphoid tissues and that there might be asymptomatic
human carriers of CWD infection.***
==================
P.105: RT-QuIC models trans-species prion transmission
Kristen Davenport, Davin Henderson, Candace Mathiason, and Edward Hoover
Prion Research Center; Colorado State University; Fort Collins, CO USA
Conversely, FSE maintained sufficient BSE characteristics to more
efficiently convert bovine rPrP than feline rPrP. Additionally, human rPrP was
competent for conversion by CWD and fCWD.
***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the
barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously
estimated.
================
***This insinuates that, at the level of protein:protein interactions, the
barrier preventing transmission of CWD to humans is less robust than previously
estimated.***
================
*** PRICE OF CWD TSE PRION POKER GOES UP 2014 ***
Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE PRION update January 2, 2014
*** chronic wasting disease, there was no absolute barrier to conversion of
the human prion protein.
*** Furthermore, the form of human PrPres produced in this in vitro assay
when seeded with CWD, resembles that found in the most common human prion
disease, namely sCJD of the MM1 subtype.
*** These results would seem to suggest that CWD does indeed have zoonotic
potential, at least as judged by the compatibility of CWD prions and their human
PrPC target. Furthermore, extrapolation from this simple in vitro assay suggests
that if zoonotic CWD occurred, it would most likely effect those of the PRNP
codon 129-MM genotype and that the PrPres type would be similar to that found in
the most common subtype of sCJD (MM1).***
*** The potential impact of prion diseases on human health was greatly
magnified by the recognition that interspecies transfer of BSE to humans by beef
ingestion resulted in vCJD. While changes in animal feed constituents and
slaughter practices appear to have curtailed vCJD, there is concern that CWD of
free-ranging deer and elk in the U.S. might also cross the species barrier.
Thus, consuming venison could be a source of human prion disease. Whether BSE
and CWD represent interspecies scrapie transfer or are newly arisen prion
diseases is unknown. Therefore, the possibility of transmission of prion disease
through other food animals cannot be ruled out. There is evidence that vCJD can
be transmitted through blood transfusion. There is likely a pool of unknown size
of asymptomatic individuals infected with vCJD, and there may be asymptomatic
individuals infected with the CWD equivalent. These circumstances represent a
potential threat to blood, blood products, and plasma supplies.
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Real and perceived issues involving animal proteins C. R. Hamilton May 3,
2002, a review of USDA MAD COW DISEASE BSE FEED
Wednesday, September 03, 2014
Coexistence of mixed phenotype Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Lewy body disease
and argyrophilic grain disease plus histological features of possible
Alzheimer's disease: A multi-protein disorder in an autopsy case
These findings support the view of the co-occurrence of multiple PrPres
fragments within MM1 prions rather than the co-occurrence of multiple prion
strains within the same individual.
In conclusion, the present study, together with evidence from other
groups,11,12 suggests that the co-occurrence of multiple PrPres fragments within
a single sCJD patient is a universal phenomenon. These findings show that the
conventional typing of PrPres merely represents the predominant PrPres
subpopulation among multiple co-existing PrPres fragments. Besides the general
co-occurrence of multiple PrPres fragments, the condition of PK digestion easily
affects the size of PrPres.27,28 Indeed, insufficient PK digestion can generate
type 1 PrPres-specific antibody–reactive fragments in the sCJD patients
classified as type 2.29 Furthermore, it is possible that the conventional
Western blot analysis fails to detect type 2 PrPres in sCJD-MM1+2 cases showing
very focal perivacuolar PrP deposition in the brain.9 These confusing aspects of
PrPres typing question the validity of the conventional molecular typing system.
For a precise classification, it may be appropriate that the neuropathological
phenotyping [synaptic (SY), perivacuolar (PV), plaque (PL), or patchy plaque
(PP)] be combined with the molecular typing [eg, sCJD-MM1(+2)/SY+PV] the sCJD-MM
patient showing synaptic + perivacuolar PrP deposition, but not type 2 PrPres in
the conventional Western blot analysis.
Even though experiments in rodents performed some years ago demonstrated
the phenomenon of multiple PrPSc types within one animal [21], incongruity
regarding the frequency of co-occurrence of different PrPSc types in sCJD
patients still endures. Initial studies suggested that this is a relatively rare
event, occurring in less than 5% of patients [8]. This low incidence may, at
least partially, be attributed to the fact that these analyses are routinely
performed on a limited range of distinct brain regions per patient [8,13]. The
fact that region-specific presence of distinct PrPSc types may occur in sCJD was
highlighted by a publication investigating ten defined regions within the
central nervous system in 14 patients with sCJD [16]. The authors found more
than one PrPSc type in five individuals and hypothesized that the co-occurrence
of more than one PrPSc type could be the rule, rather than the exception, if the
entire central nervous system was investigated. In our analysis of nine distinct
central-nervous-system regions in 50 patients with sCJD using a standardized
protocol [22], we detected more than one PrPSc type in nine individuals. The
observation that most patients harboring two PrPSc types are codon-129
methionine/valine heterozygotes stresses the significance of this polymorphism
in the replicative cycle of PrPSc.
Coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in individuals with Creutzfeldt-Jakob
disease
Magdalini Polymenidou, Katharina Stoeck, Markus Glatzel, Martin Vey, Anne
Bellon, and Adriano Aguzzi
Summary
Background The molecular typing of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)
is based on the size and glycoform ratio of protease-resistant prion protein
(PrPSc), and on PRNP haplotype. On digestion with proteinase K, type 1 and type
2 PrPSc display unglycosylated core fragments of 21 kDa and 19 kDa, resulting
from cleavage around amino acids 82 and 97, respectively.
Methods We generated anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies to epitopes immediately
preceding the differential proteinase K cleavage sites. These antibodies, which
were designated POM2 and POM12, recognise type 1, but not type 2, PrPSc.
Findings We studied 114 brain samples from 70 patients with sporadic CJD
and three patients with variant CJD. Every patient classified as CJD type 2, and
all variant CJD patients, showed POM2/POM12 reactivity in the cerebellum and
other PrPSc-rich brain areas, with a typical PrPSc type 1 migration
pattern.
Interpretation The regular coexistence of multiple PrPSc types in patients
with CJD casts doubts on the validity of electrophoretic PrPSc mobilities as
surrogates for prion strains, and questions the rational basis of current CJD
classifications.
snip...
Discussion
The discovery of heritable polymorphic PK cleavage sites in PrPSc has been
used for the molecular classification of CJD cases.11,13,14,17 In concert with
the codon 129 PRNP haplotype, the different PrPSc types correlate with distinct
disease phenotypes. Most patients with the MM1 or MV1 subtype present with
so-called classic CJD, and show rapid progressive dementia, early myoclonus,
visual disturbances including cortical blindness, and a disease duration of
approximately 4 months. By contrast, patients with the MV2 or VV2 subtype show
an atypical disease course, with a longer disease duration (6–18 months), early
ataxia, predominant extrapyramidal symptoms, and late-onset dementia.18
Because of the limited resolution of conventional western blot systems, the
coexistence of PK-digested PrPSc bands at 19 kDa and 21 kDa is not recognisable
by conventional antibodies binding to both PrPSc types, including POM1. By
mixing brain homogenates that contain solely type 1 or type 2 PrPSc, we have
found that 3F4-based or POM1-based western blots consistently fail to detect
type 1 PrPSc whenever it represents less than 30–40% of total PrPSc. We
addressed these problems by developing a set of antibodies binding Nproximal
epitopes of PrP, which recognise PK-digested type 1 PrPSc (cleaved at amino acid
82 or upstream), but not type 2 PrPSc (cleaved at amino acids 97 or 86).
On investigation of 70 sporadic CJD cases, we determined that 50% of the
patients formerly classified as CJD type 2 had low but detectable amounts of
PrPSc type 1 in their cerebral cortex. Investigations of additional brain areas
revealed that significant amounts of PrPSc type 1 coexist with type 2 in at
least some areas of all patients classified as having type 2 disease.
Co-occurrence of CJD types in the same brain has been previously reported in
approximately 30% of the tested cases.24 Using unambiguous analytical tools, we
have established that type 2 PrPSc does not exist independently from type 1
PrPSc, at least not in the Swiss CJD patients included in our study.
Furthermore, using our type 1-specific antibodies, we found type 1 PrPSc
content in three cortical samples of vCJD patients.
Glycotyping of blots incubated with 3F4/POM1 versus POM2/POM12 showed no
significant differences in glycoform ratios, neither for the same groups
incubated with different antibodies, nor for the two PrPSc groups, in accordance
with previously published data.33 The homogeneity of glycoforms suggests that
our collective is comparable to those investigated in other countries, despite
the peculiarities of Swiss CJD epidemiology.34
The results presented here do not question the validity of the established
correlations between PrPSc types and clinical findings. The coincident presence
of PrPSc type 1 may not alter the expected clinical outcome of patients with
predominant PrPSc type 2 deposition. However, the existence of heritable PrPSc
types implies that strainspecific characteristics of prions are enshrined in the
conformation of PrPSc, and that the different core fragment sizes of PK-digested
PrPSc may be used as surrogates of such conformational variations. In the light
of the data presented here, the strength of these arguments becomes somewhat
questionable.
Why did the co-existence of type 1 and type 2 PrPSc go often undetected in
the past, despite its ubiquitous presence? Maybe the 21 kDa band characteristic
of type 1 PrPSc is easily obfuscated by the simultaneous occurrence of the
neighbouring 19 kDa type 2 band and of the monoglycosylated PrPSc band. We
tested this hypothesis by ascertaining the detectability threshold of type 1
PrPSc in mixtures of pure type 1 and type 2 samples. Indeed, we found that type
1 PrPSc becomes undiscernible as soon as 40% or more type 2 PrPSc is present.
This observation provides a plausible explanation for the failure to appreciate
the invariable coexistence of PrPSc types in previous reports.
To determine whether a similar phenomenon occurs in patients classified as
type 1 would be interesting. However, this issue is impossible to address at
present, as there is no CJD type-2-specific antibody. The fact that the type 1
coexistence is also apparent in cortical samples from CJD patients, indicates
that the currently described phenomenon might be a more general one. The above
results set the existing CJD classifications into debate and introduce
interesting questions about human CJD types. For example, do human prion types
exist in a dynamic equilibrium in the brains of affected individuals? Do they
coexist in most or even all CJD cases? Is the biochemically identified PrPSc
type simply the dominant type, and not the only PrPSc species?
Friday, October 11, 2013 Coexistence of Distinct Prion Types Enables
Conformational Evolution of Human PrPSc by Competitive Selection http://creutzfeldt-jakob-disease.blogspot.com/2013/10/coexistence-of-distinct-prion-types.html
Saturday, November 14, 2009 Isolation of two distinct prion strains from a
scrapie-affected sheep http://scrapie-usa.blogspot.com/2009/11/isolation-of-two-distinct-prion-strains.html
Evidence for human transmission of amyloid-β pathology and cerebral
amyloid angiopathy
07 02:27 AM
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. said:
re-Evidence for human transmission of amyloid-β pathology and cerebral
amyloid angiopathy
2015-12-07 02:27 AM
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. said: re-Evidence for human transmission of
amyloid-β pathology and cerebral amyloid angiopathy
Nature 525, 247?250 (10 September 2015) doi:10.1038/nature15369 Received 26
April 2015 Accepted 14 August 2015 Published online 09 September 2015 Updated
online 11 September 2015 Erratum (October, 2015)
I would kindly like to comment on the Nature Paper, the Lancet reply, and
the newspaper articles.
First, I applaud Nature, the Scientist and Authors of the Nature paper, for
bringing this important finding to the attention of the public domain, and the
media for printing said findings.
Secondly, it seems once again, politics is getting in the way possibly of
more important Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy TSE Prion scientific
findings. findings that could have great implications for human health, and
great implications for the medical surgical arena. but apparently, the
government peer review process, of the peer review science, tries to intervene
again to water down said disturbing findings.
where have we all heard this before? it’s been well documented via the BSE
Inquiry. have they not learned a lesson from the last time?
we have seen this time and time again in England (and other Country’s) with
the BSE mad cow TSE Prion debacle.
That ‘anonymous' Lancet editorial was disgraceful. The editor, Dick Horton
is not a scientist.
The pituitary cadavers were very likely elderly and among them some were on
their way to CJD or Alzheimer's. Not a bit unusual. Then the recipients who got
pooled extracts injected from thousands of cadavers were 100% certain to have
been injected with both seeds. No surprise that they got both diseases going
after thirty year incubations.
That the UK has a "system in place to assist science journalists" to squash
embargoed science reports they find ‘alarming’ is pathetic.
Sounds like the journalists had it right in the first place: ‘Alzheimer’s
may be a transmissible infection’ in The Independent to ’You can catch
Alzheimer’s’ in The Daily Mirror or ‘Alzheimer’s bombshell" in The Daily
Express.
if not for the journalist, the layperson would not know about these
important findings.
where would we be today with sound science, from where we were 30 years
ago, if not for the cloak of secrecy and save the industry at all cost
mentality?
when you have a peer review system for science, from which a government
constantly circumvents, then you have a problem with science, and humans die.
to date, as far as documented body bag count, with all TSE prion named to
date, that count is still relatively low (one was too many in my case, Mom
hvCJD), however that changes drastically once the TSE Prion link is made with
Alzheimer’s, the price of poker goes up drastically.
so, who makes that final decision, and how many more decades do we have to
wait?
the iatrogenic mode of transmission of TSE prion, the many routes there
from, load factor, threshold from said load factor to sub-clinical disease, to
clinical disease, to death, much time is there to spread a TSE Prion to
anywhere, but whom, by whom, and when, do we make that final decision to do
something about it globally? how many documented body bags does it take? how
many more decades do we wait? how many names can we make up for one disease, TSE
prion?
Professor Collinge et al, and others, have had troubles in the past with
the Government meddling in scientific findings, that might in some way involve
industry, never mind human and or animal health.
FOR any government to continue to circumvent science for monetary gain,
fear factor, or any reason, shame, shame on you.
in my opinion, it’s one of the reasons we are at where we are at to date,
with regards to the TSE Prion disease science i.e. money, industry, politics,
then comes science, in that order.
greed, corporate, lobbyist there from, and government, must be removed from
the peer review process of sound science, it’s bad enough having them in the
pharmaceutical aspect of healthcare policy making, in my opinion.
my mother died from confirmed hvCJD, and her brother (my uncle) Alzheimer’s
of some type (no autopsy?). just made a promise, never forget, and never let
them forget, before I do.
I kindly wish to remind the public of the past, and a possible future we
all hopes never happens again. ...
[9. Whilst this matter is not at the moment directly concerned with the
iatrogenic CJD cases from hgH, there remains a possibility of litigation here,
and this presents an added complication. There are also results to be made
available shortly (1) concerning a farmer with CJD who had BSE animals, (2) on
the possible transmissibility of Alzheimer’s and (3) a CMO letter on prevention
of iatrogenic CJD transmission in neurosurgery, all of which will serve to
increase media interest.]
snip...see full Singeltary Nature comment here;
see Singeltary comments to Plos ;
Subject: 1992 IN CONFIDENCE TRANSMISSION OF ALZHEIMER TYPE PLAQUES TO
PRIMATES POSSIBILITY ON A TRANSMISSIBLE PRION REMAINS OPEN
BSE101/1 0136
IN CONFIDENCE
CMO
From: . Dr J S Metiers DCMO
4 November 1992
TRANSMISSION OF ALZHEIMER TYPE PLAQUES TO PRIMATES
1. Thank you for showing me Diana Dunstan's letter. I am glad that MRC have
recognised the public sensitivity of these findings and intend to report them in
their proper context. 'This hopefully will avoid misunderstanding and possible
distortion by the media to portray the results as having more greater
significance than the findings so far justify.
2. Using a highly unusual route of transmission (intra-cerebral injection)
the researchers have demonstrated the transmission of a pathological process
from two cases one of severe Alzheimer's disease the other of
Gerstmann-Straussler disease to marmosets. However they have not demonstrated
the transmission of either clinical condition as the "animals were behaving
normally when killed". As the report emphasises the unanswered question is
whether the disease condition would have revealed itself if the marmosets had
lived longer. They are planning further research to see if the conditions, as
opposed to the partial pathological process, is transmissible.
what are the implications for public health?
3. The route 'of transmission is very specific and in the natural state of
things highly unusual. However it could be argued that the results reveal a
potential risk, in that brain tissue from these two patients has been shown to
transmit a pathological process. Should therefore brain tissue from such cases
be regarded as potentially infective? Pathologists, morticians, neuro surgeons
and those assisting at neuro surgical procedures and others coming into contact
with "raw" human brain tissue could in theory be at risk. However, on a priori
grounds given the highly specific route of transmission in these experiments
that risk must be negligible if the usual precautions for handling brain tissue
are observed.
1
92/11.4/1.1
BSE101/1 0137
4. The other dimension to consider is the public reaction. To some extent
the GSS case demonstrates little more than the transmission of BSE to a pig by
intra-cerebral injection. If other prion diseases can be transmitted in this way
it is little surprise that some pathological findings observed in GSS were also
transmissible to a marmoset. But the transmission of features of Alzheimer's
pathology is a different matter, given the much greater frequency of this
disease and raises the unanswered question whether some cases are the result of
a transmissible prion. The only tenable public line will be that "more research
is required’’ before that hypothesis could be evaluated. The possibility on a
transmissible prion remains open. In the meantime MRC needs carefully to
consider the range and sequence of studies needed to follow through from the
preliminary observations in these two cases. Not a particularly comfortable
message, but until we know more about the causation of Alzheimer's disease the
total reassurance is not practical.
J S METTERS Room 509 Richmond House Pager No: 081-884 3344 Callsign: DOH
832 llllYc!eS 2 92/11.4/1.2
>>> The only tenable public line will be that "more research is
required’’ <<<
>>> possibility on a transmissible prion remains
open<<<
O.K., so it’s about 23 years later, so somebody please tell me, when is
"more research is required’’ enough time for evaluation ?
Self-Propagative Replication of Ab Oligomers Suggests Potential
Transmissibility in Alzheimer Disease
*** Singeltary comment PLoS ***
Alzheimer’s disease and Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy prion
disease, Iatrogenic, what if ?
Posted by flounder on 05 Nov 2014 at 21:27 GMT
Sunday, November 22, 2015
*** Effect of heating on the stability of amyloid A (AA) fibrils and the
intra- and cross-species transmission of AA amyloidosis Abstract
Amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis is a protein misfolding disease characterized by
extracellular deposition of AA fibrils. AA fibrils are found in several tissues
from food animals with AA amyloidosis. For hygienic purposes, heating is widely
used to inactivate microbes in food, but it is uncertain whether heating is
sufficient to inactivate AA fibrils and prevent intra- or cross-species
transmission. We examined the effect of heating (at 60 °C or 100 °C) and
autoclaving (at 121 °C or 135 °C) on murine and bovine AA fibrils using Western
blot analysis, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and mouse model
transmission experiments. TEM revealed that a mixture of AA fibrils and
amorphous aggregates appeared after heating at 100 °C, whereas autoclaving at
135 °C produced large amorphous aggregates. AA fibrils retained antigen
specificity in Western blot analysis when heated at 100 °C or autoclaved at 121
°C, but not when autoclaved at 135 °C. Transmissible pathogenicity of murine and
bovine AA fibrils subjected to heating (at 60 °C or 100 °C) was significantly
stimulated and resulted in amyloid deposition in mice. Autoclaving of murine AA
fibrils at 121 °C or 135 °C significantly decreased amyloid deposition.
Moreover, amyloid deposition in mice injected with murine AA fibrils was more
severe than that in mice injected with bovine AA fibrils. Bovine AA fibrils
autoclaved at 121 °C or 135 °C did not induce amyloid deposition in mice. These
results suggest that AA fibrils are relatively heat stable and that similar to
prions, autoclaving at 135 °C is required to destroy the pathogenicity of AA
fibrils. These findings may contribute to the prevention of AA fibril
transmission through food materials to different animals and especially to
humans.
Purchase options Price * Issue Purchase USD 511.00 Article Purchase USD
54.00
*** Transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease to a chimpanzee by electrodes
contaminated during neurosurgery ***
Gibbs CJ Jr, Asher DM, Kobrine A, Amyx HL, Sulima MP, Gajdusek DC.
Laboratory of Central Nervous System Studies, National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
Stereotactic multicontact electrodes used to probe the cerebral cortex of a
middle aged woman with progressive dementia were previously implicated in the
accidental transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) to two younger
patients. The diagnoses of CJD have been confirmed for all three cases. More
than two years after their last use in humans, after three cleanings and
repeated sterilisation in ethanol and formaldehyde vapour, the electrodes were
implanted in the cortex of a chimpanzee. Eighteen months later the animal became
ill with CJD. This finding serves to re-emphasise the potential danger posed by
reuse of instruments contaminated with the agents of spongiform
encephalopathies, even after scrupulous attempts to clean them.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8006664&dopt=Abstract
the warning shots fired over the bow of the boat that were never heard ;
PITUITARY EXTRACT
This was used to help cows super ovulate. This tissue was considered to be
of greatest risk of containing BSE and consequently transmitting the disease...
TSS
kind regards, terry
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. Bacliff, Texas USA 77518 flounder9@verizon.net
No comments:
Post a Comment